Lofland v. Truitt
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MARVEL, Vice Chancellor:
Defendants have built a wire and post fence across what plaintiffs claim is their established means of access to their properties, 1 and, after trial, plaintiffs ask for a permanent injunction against such interference by defendants with their alleged rights of ingress and egress to their separate lots over the road in question. Plaintiffs’ application is based on two arguments. They contend first that an easement for such use has been established by prescription. Alternatively, they take the position that if an easement has not been shown to have been established,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reinhardt v. ChalfantCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1920
- Biggs v. WolfeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
- Lewes Trust Co. v. GrindleSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
- Biggs v. WolfeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1962
- Lynam v. ClayvilleCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Scureman v. JudgeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1992
- Simon v. PettitSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Buckeye Partners, L.P. v. GT USA Wilmington, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2022
- Joan Narvesen v. John Anthony PalmerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2025
- Simon v. PettitSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984