Boatwright v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
Appellant Raymond Edward Boatwright was convicted of intentionally and knowingly carrying a handgun and an illegal knife. On appeal, he argues two points of error. First, he contends that the trial court failed to comply with the requirements of articles 36.27 and 36.28 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure when the trial judge permitted testimony to be read back to the jury. Second, the appellant argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to establish that he intentionally and knowingly possessed a weapon. We affirm.
On the date of the offenses…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Hollins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Randon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- Albert Randon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
- Crumbley Jr., Robert Earl v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- Dominique Lamar Betancourt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2003
- Hicks, Fredrick Lee v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.