Legal Opinion
People v. Curtis
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided September 13, 1972No. Docket 13524PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, J.
Defendant was arrested on a complaint and warrant charging sale of marijuana, contrary to MCLA 335.152; MSA 18.1122. He was arraigned in district court and the case was adjourned for a preliminary examination.
*654Between the time of the arraignment and the date set for the preliminary examination an agreement was reached between the prosecutor and the defense attorney. It was agreed that a second count, charging possession of marijuana, would be added to the charge, and the defendant would be allowed to plead guilty to the second count. Count I was to be nol-prossed.
Defendant was rearraigned in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Genesee Prosecutor v. Genesee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. CiattiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- In the Matter of MikesellMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. MurphyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- People of Michigan v. Mark Andrew SekelskyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
- People v. CurtisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.