Legal Opinion · Dissent

Buckley v. Brethren Mutual Insurance

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 26, 2012No. 1855Published

1Dissent

EYLER, DEBORAH S., J.,

dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion.

Ember Buckley was injured in a single-car accident when she was a passenger in a car being driven by Harvey Betts. She sued Betts—the only alleged or possible tortfeasor—for negligence. Upon reaching a settlement with Betts for $100,000, which was the limit of his automobile liability insurance policy with GEICO, Buckley executed a general release. The release discharged any claim of any nature Buckley had against “all persons, firms, and corporations” arising out of the accident.

Buckley had sued Brethren, her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peters v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  2. Pemrock, Inc. v. Essco Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Butler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Thomas v. Erie Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  5. Maurer v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API