Legal Opinion

Royal v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 24, 1835PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Chancer* From the Circuit Court eor Jessamine County.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Robertson

Miller, holding a bond on Williamson’s Heirs for the conveyance of the legal title to a tract of land, for a price which he had paid, assigned it to Robert Eastin, for a valuable consideration, agreed to be paid in instalments.

Sometime after the assignment, Eastin covenanted to build for Miller a brick house, in consideration of about one thousand dollars, to be credited on his notes for the price of the land, as soon as the work should be finished; and Miller reserved an express lien on the equitable interest in the land, as a collateral security for the building of the house.

After the date…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tennis Coal Co. v. AsherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Spillman v. SwangoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1878
  3. Tiernan v. ThurmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1853

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API