Manchester Fire Assurance Co. v. Feibelman
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jefferson. Tried before the Hon. James J. Banks. This action was brought by the appellee, E. Feibelman, against the Manchester Fire Assurance Company, and was commenced on May 6, 1892. The complaint as originally filed contained one count, and was as follows: “1. The plaintiff claims of the defendant the sum of fourteen hundred, three and no-100 dollars, being the value of the loss by fire on fixtures, six 'hundred dollars, two pool tables,…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jefferson. Tried before the Hon. James J. Banks. This action was brought by the appellee, E. Feibelman, against the Manchester Fire Assurance Company, and was commenced on May 6, 1892. The complaint as originally filed contained one count, and was as follows: “1. The plaintiff claims of the defendant the sum of fourteen hundred, three and no-100 dollars, being the value of the loss by fire on fixtures, six 'hundred dollars, two pool tables, one hundred dollars each, and six hundred and three dollars on stock of wine, brandy, whiskey, beer, tobacco and cigars…
1Opinion of the CourtHaralson, J.
1. After this case was reversed on a former appeal, defendant filed additional pleas, numbered 193, 26, 27, 28 and 29. Demurrers Avere interposed to these pleas, which Avere sustained. There Avas no error in such rulings. The first four of these pleas, as admitted by counsel for appellant, raise substantially the same questions, — that the plaintiff had never procured a license under the laws of Alabama, to carry on the business in AAdiich he was engaged, down to and including the time that the property insured was injured or destined by fire. We held in our former opinion, and fail to see…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Booth v. . Boston and Albany R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Feibelman v. Manchester Fire Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Western Assurance Co. v. StoddardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Schuster v. . Dutchess County Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Doe ex dem. Evans v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
3Cited by18 opinions
- Goorberg v. the Western Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Nelson v. First National Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Hart v. North British Mercantile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- Alabama G. S. R. R. v. FlinnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.