Legal Opinion

Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 8, 1938No. 1777PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LESLIE, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff, Eula Janfe Smith, instituted this suit against the defendant to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been inflicted on her by reason of the defendant’s employees forcibly and negligently removing her from the toilet of the defendant’s train while she was a lawful passenger thereon. As the result of the treatment thus received she alleges that she sustained various. serious and permanent injuries, suffered a miscarriage, etc.

The defendant answered by general demurrer, general denial, and plea of contributory negligence. It was the pleading and proof…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange v. StephensTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Corn v. Crosby County Cattle Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  3. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. ShuddeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Texas Co. v. RamsowerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  5. Lowrimore v. SandersTexas Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Southern Underwriters v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Southland Life Ins. Co. v. GreenwadeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. of Texas v. McKinneyTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Ohlen v. HagarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. McKinneyTexas Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API