Legal Opinion

Stiles v. Giddens

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1858PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Red River. Tried below before Hon. W. S. Todd.

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This case is brought into this Court to revise the decision of the District Court overruling a motion made by defendants in error to set aside a nonsuit taken by them.

The error assignéd, which embraces that contained in said motion, is, that the Court erred in excluding the testimony of Butler, defendants’ witness.

The evidence was offered in support of defendants' amended petition, filed 27th November, 1854, setting up facts to avoid and annul the deed of release of their ancestor, Wesley P„ Byers, to the land in controversy, executed by his agent, Floyd, to Aldarine Hughart. which deed was…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. de Garca v. GalvanTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Peerless Oil & Gas Co. v. TeasTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  3. McEwen v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Kahle v. StoneTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  5. City of Amarillo v. RustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API