Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lemieux v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1982No. 15769-SAPublished

1Concurrence

HOLOHAN, Chief Justice and HAYS, Justice

(specially concurring):

Having presented our position on this subject in State ex rel. Collins v. Superior Court, 131 Ariz. 180, 644 P.2d 1266 (1982), no useful purpose would be served by adding anything additional. We concur in the result.

SPECIAL ACTION SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice.

In our original opinion in this case, we held that persons who had undergone hypnosis and had been questioned on matters concerning the litigation would not be permitted to testify at a subsequent civil trial. Lemieux v. Superior Court, 131 Ariz. 214, 644 P.2d 1300…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HurdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. GatesArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Lemieux v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API