Legal Opinion

Polipo v. Sanders

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stanley Green, J.

Motion of the defendant Edith Sanders (Sanders) pursuant to CPLR 5015 (d), for restitution of the amount of $577,805.25 plus interest, following the reversal of the judgment entered in this action, pursuant to which her insurance carrier made the payment, is granted, with $100 costs. The plaintiff, Frederick Polipo, and his attorneys, Esterman & Esterman, P. C., are directed to forthwith return to the law firm of O’Brien & Mayr, attorneys for the defendant Edith Sanders, the sum of $577,805.25 plus interest from September 30, 1996, plus $100 costs.

DISCUSSIO…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Pavia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Best Building Co. v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Soto v. State Farm InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. P.S. Fin., LLC v. Eureka Woodworks, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  2. Polipo v. SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API