Legal Opinion

Mire v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1976No. 5601PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

Plaintiff Lorena St. Amant Mire appeals the dismissal of her claim against defendant Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York on its exception of no cause of action. F&C attached its insurance policy to its exception and based its exception on a policy exclusion. We reverse.

LSA-C.C.P. art. 931 excludes the taking of evidence to support the objection that the petition fails to state a cause of action. In ruling on an exception of no cause of action, only the well-pleaded facts in plaintiff’s petition or documents attached thereto can be considered. Documents not attached to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  2. American Creosote Company v. SpringerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
  3. Parks v. Winnfield Life Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aycock v. CHICOLALouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Fayard v. McCallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Alombro v. Campbell "66" Express, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Lavelle W. Aycock v. Daniel ChicolaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API