Legal Opinion

Brox v. Riker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Charles Brox and others against William B. Biker and others. From an order denying a motion to cancel a notice of lis pendens, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtIngraham, J.

The plaintiffs, as judgment creditors, brought this action to set aside the transfer of a certain drug business, and the goods, chattels, properties, and effects belonging or appertaining thereto, made by defendant William H. Biker to the defendant William B. Biker, as made with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud the creditors of the assignor. It is alleged in the complaint that William B. Biker was the owner in fee simple of certain real estate upon the westerly side of Sixth avenue, in the city of New York, which was subject to a mortgage, and that William B. Biker, with the proceeds of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fitzsimons v. DroughtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brownlee v. VangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. In re RikerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API