Legal Opinion

Swaine v. Maryott

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts of this case appear in the following opinion of the vice-chancellor, from which the appeal was taken.

1Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Chancellor.

This is a foreclosure suit. The defence rests mainly upon an agreement, alleged to have been made by the complainants with the defendants, to cancel and surrender the mortgage on which their action is founded. It is said to be lost. What purports to be the original draft of it has been produced. The burden of proving its due execution and contents rests on the defendants. The defendants’ evidence *590on this point comes almost exclusively from the mouth of one of the defendants. He is flatly contradicted by the father of the complainants: Besides, his account of the manner in…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Farber v. Plainfield Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
  2. Zuckermandel v. ZuckermandelNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API