Mills v. Estate of Grant
Supreme Court of Vermont
' AppfAl prom Probate.' The probate court accepted the report of commissioners, setting out .the dower and homestead» The County Court, Sept. Term, 1862, Peck, J., presiding, pro forma affirmed the decree of the probate court, — exceptions by the appellant. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Kellogg,'J.
The deceased, Orsamus A* Grant,-died seized, and possessed of two distinct parcels of land situated in North-field, one of which was fifty rods distant from the other, and a ’parcel of land owned by another person was situated between the two. One parcel, upon which was a dwelling-house, outbuildings, and. garden, contained about one and three-fourths acres, and the other contained about twenty and one-fourth acres ; and the deceased, at the time of his death, was occupying the first or smaller parcel for the purposes of a dwelling-house and house lot, and the other .parcel as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Howe v. AdamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
- True v. Estate of MorrillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
3Cited by6 opinions
- Whiteman v. FieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1881
- Cushman v. DavisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1906
- Rice v. RuddSupreme Court of Vermont · 1885
- Cabler v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- In re MeadUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.