Legal Opinion

Vassilakos v. Vassilakos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 27, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Under the circumstances of this case, the imposition of sanctions of $3,500 against defendant’s attorney as a condition of relieving defendant from his default is warranted and is an appropriate exercise of Supreme Court’s discretion (see, Folk v State of New York, 185 AD2d 267, 268; Sasson v Sasson, 134 AD2d 491, 492; Gabrelian v Gabrelian, 108 AD2d 445, 447-448, appeal dismissed 66 NY2d 741). The challenge to the propriety of the order striking defendant’s answer is not properly before us because defendant did not appeal from that order…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hecht v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Gabrelian v. GabrelianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Folk v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Sasson v. SassonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mura v. MuraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API