Legal Opinion

Klor's, Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 6, 1959No. 76PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

Klor’s, Inc., operates a retail store on Mission Street, San Francisco, California; Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc., a chain of department stores, operates one of its stores next door. The two stores compete in the sale of radios, television sets, refrigerators and other household appliances. Claiming that Broadway-Hale and 10 national manufacturers and their distributors have conspired to restrain and monopolize commerce in violation of §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § §. 1, 2, Klor’s brought this action for treble damages and injunction in the United States…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Paul Lessig v. Tidewater Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  4. Richard J. Angelico, M.D. v. Lehigh Valley Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Cernuto, Inc. v. United Cabinet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API