Legal Opinion

Reed v. Marley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 2, 1959No. 5-1758PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carleton Harris, Chief Justice.

This appeal involves the interpretation of Subsection (a), Ark. Stats. § 28-357 (Section 10. of Act 335 of 1953). The subsection reads as follows:

“In an action in which the mental or physical condition of a party is in controversy, the court in which the action is pending may order him to submit to a physical or mental examination by a physician selected by the petitioner. The order may be only on motion for good cause shown and upon notice to the party to be examined and to all other parties and shall specify the time, place, manner, conditions, and scope of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bucher v. KrauseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  2. Leach v. Greif Bros. Cooperage Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1942
  3. Strasser v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1939
  4. Hollister v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. New Empire Ins. Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  2. Carroll v. BurchettScioto County Court of Common Pleas · 1967
  3. Demorest v. CsoreyLake County Court of Common Pleas · 1968
  4. Mallett v. BrannonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  5. Lureen v. HollDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API