Legal Opinion
Fite v. Sysco Sacramento, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 24, 2025No. 2:21-cv-01633Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GLENN FITE, et al., No. 2:21-CV-01633-DJC-AC 12 Plaintiffs, v. 13 ORDER SYSCO SACRAMENTO, INC., et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 Plaintiffs bring this action against their former employer alleging Defendant’s 18 policies caused them to forgo legally mandated meal and rest breaks without 19 compensation. Plaintiffs allege various claims under the California Labor Code arising 20 from this unpaid off-the-clock work. Defendant now seeks judgment on the 21 pleadings, arguing Plaintiffs’ claims are preempted…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Livadas v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.