Legal Opinion

Cobb v. Frazee

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1850PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gridley, Justice.

—This is a demurrer to a part of an answer. The plaintiff’s counsel has selected from the answer several sentences, forming a part of the statement of one entire ground of defence, and demurred to them; while he has replied to the residue of the answer. And the question is not whether the matter demurred to is “ irrelevant and redundant,” and subject to be stricken out, on motion, under the 60th section of the code; but whether the plaintiff can demur except to an entire defence.

The determination of this question must depend on the provisions of the code. By section 150, it…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dingeldein v. Third Avenue RailroadThe Superior Court of New York City · 1861
  2. Ludington v. SlausonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1874
  3. McKesson v. Russian Co.New York Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API