Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Hancock v. Aler

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POFEENBARGER, PRESIDENT:

The defense to this action by motion to recover the amounts due upon three negotiable notes, from the maker and an endorser, was limited to parts of the amounts claimed, and proceeded upon the theory of the perpetration of a fraud upon the endorser, by the cashier of the plaintiff bank, with its knowledge and assent. The notes were for $2,500.00, $700.00 and'$250.00 respectively. Liability for $1,500.00 on account of the first, $650.00 on .account of the second and *315$225.00 on account of the third was admitted, and the action defended as to the residue of $1,075.00.

An…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bank v. BryanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Bank v. Lowther-Kaufman Oil & Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nehring v. BastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Knobley Mountain Orchard Co. v. Peoples Bank of KeyserWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. People ex rel. Russel v. Michigan Avenue Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  4. Farmers Life Insurance v. HoughtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Seal v. GwinnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API