Legal Opinion

Bronson & Soutter v. LA CROSSE AND MILWAUKEE RAILROAD CO.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 23, 1864PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

68 U.S. 405 (1863)

1 Wall. 405

BRONSON & SOUTTER, Complainants and Appellants,

v.

THE LA CROSSE AND MILWAUKEE RAILROAD CO.; THE MILWAUKEE AND MINNESOTA RAILROAD CO., CHAMBERLAIN ET AL. [Appeal.] ALSO, THE MILWAUKEE AND MINNESOTA RAILROAD CO., Appellants,

v.

SOUTTER, who survived BRONSON & SOUTTER. Trustees, &c. [Cross Appeal.]

Supreme Court of United States.

Mr. Carpenter, contra.

Mr. Justice NELSON, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court:

The question involves the construction of two acts of Congress.

After the decision of this court at the last term, it cannot be pretended that the…

2Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Northern Indiana Public Service Company, an Indiana Corporation v. Carbon County Coal Company, a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Hmg Property Investors, Inc. v. Parque Industrial Rio Canas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  4. Adair v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Atlas MacHine & Iron Works, Inc. And Williams Enterprises, Inc., in Re Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API