Hunter v. State

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for an attempted abortion. The indictment is in strict conformity to Mr. Branch’s form (3 Branch’s Ann. P. C., sec. 1818), and conforms also strictly with the statute (P. C., arts. 1073 and 1071), and is sufficient.

The testimony of both Miss Emma Poore, the prosecutrix, and appellant was that about February 28, 1913, they became engaged to he married; that on June 1st he seduced her and on that day had sexual intercourse with her by virtue of his unlawful seduction of her; that he repeatedly during the next two or three months had sexual intercourse…