Rylee v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for larceny of cotton; from Banks superior court — Judge Fortson. December 12, 1921.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
1. “ In order for the exclusion of oral testimony to be considered as a ground for a new trial, it must appear that a. pertinent question was asked, and that the court ruled out the answer; and that a statement was made to the court at the time showing what the answer would be; and that such testimony *231was material, and would have benefited the complaining party.” Griffin v. Henderson, 117 Ga. 382 (2) (43 S. E. 712). And see Terry Shipbuilding Corp. v. Gregory, 26 Ga. App. 450 (3) (106 S. E. 803). Under the above ruling the 1st ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial can not be…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Griffin v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Wade v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Corbin v. McCraryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Nelling v. Industrial Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Southern Railway Co. v. SommerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wisdom v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Smoky Mountain Stages Inc. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Campbell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Georgia Power Co. v. MozingoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.