Ohio Pure Foods, Inc. v. Barbe
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAPPY, Justice.
This case presents the question of whether a court should issue a rule to show cause why a confessed judgment should not be opened where the petitioning party offers the defense of forgery as her prima, facie grounds for relief. For the reasons which follow, we reverse the order of the Superior Court and remand to the Court of Common Pleas for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
The record evinces that on June 1, 1993, Appellant, Christine M. Barbe, President of Quick Chef, Inc., executed a cognovit guaranty (the “Guaranty”) in favor of Appellee, Ohio Pure…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Copley Qu-Wayne AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- First Seneca Bank & Trust Co. v. Laurel Mountain Development Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Earley's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
- Continental Bank v. FrankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Austen v. MarzolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ferrick v. BianchiniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- K & S Joint Ventures v. OPC Mining Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Sierra North Associates v. KRG KingsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023