Legal Opinion

In re: Kevan Harry Gilman

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 12, 2019No. CC-18-1101-STaLUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

FILED JUL 12 2019 NOT FOR PUBLICATION SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: BAP No. CC-18-1101-STaL KEVAN HARRY GILMAN, Bk. No. 1:11-bk-11603-VK Debtor. Adv. No. 1:11-ap-01389-VK TAMMY R. PHILLIPS; TAMMY R. PHILLIPS, a Professional Law Corporation, Appellants, v. MEMORANDUM* KEVAN HARRY GILMAN, Appellee. Argued and Submitted on November 29, 2018 at Pasadena, California Filed – July 12, 2019 Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court * This disposition is not appropriate for publication.…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API