Legal Opinion
Creative Designs Tattooing Associates, Inc. v. Parrish
Court of Appeals of Virginia
Decided May 25, 2010No. 1431092PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALEY, Judge.
In these consolidated cases, appellants, Creative Designs Tattooing Associates, Inc. (“Creative”) and the Virginia Uninsured Employer’s Fund (“Uninsured”), maintain the Workers’ Compensation Commission erred, inter alia, in determining that Earle Lindsey Parrish, III (“Parrish”) was an employee of Creative, rather than an independent contractor. We agree, and conclude that Parrish was an independent contractor and, accordingly, his estate is not a beneficiary of the Workers’ Compensation Act.1
That conclusion renders moot appellants’ further claims that the commission erred in…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Murray's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
- Intermodal Services, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
- Baker v. NussmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1929
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Khadim v. Laboratory Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2011
- Charlie Jeffreys v. The Uninsured Employer's FundCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2017
- Creative Designs Tattooing Associates, Inc. v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
- Peter L. Long v. Sherman & Sherman Properties and Uninsured Employer's FundCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
- Sherman & Sherman Properties v. Peter L. LongCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.