Legal Opinion

United States v. Conrad Vernon Smith

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 26, 2007No. 05-4425PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Conrad Vernon Smith appeals his 57-month sentence, asserting that the sentence is unreasonable because the district judge, in calculating the sentence, (1) engaged in impermissible fact-finding and (2) failed to follow the methodology set forth in U.S.S.G § 4A1.3, which resulted in a sentence that was greater than was necessary to comply with the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). For the reasons set forth below we AFFIRM the sentence of the district court.

BACKGROUND

Defendant Conrad Vernon Smith (“Smith”) was pulled over by state police in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. Bernard Chester WebbCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Leonard Jermain WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. United States v. Herrera-ZunigaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. VowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. AuteryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Norman BorhoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API