United States v. Conrad Vernon Smith
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Conrad Vernon Smith appeals his 57-month sentence, asserting that the sentence is unreasonable because the district judge, in calculating the sentence, (1) engaged in impermissible fact-finding and (2) failed to follow the methodology set forth in U.S.S.G § 4A1.3, which resulted in a sentence that was greater than was necessary to comply with the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). For the reasons set forth below we AFFIRM the sentence of the district court.
BACKGROUND
Defendant Conrad Vernon Smith (“Smith”) was pulled over by state police in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Bernard Chester WebbCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Leonard Jermain WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- United States v. Herrera-ZunigaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. VowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. AuteryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Norman BorhoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.