Legal Opinion
Haiduk v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
Decided September 24, 1990No. Docket No. 36632-87UnpublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT F. AND FRANCES H. HAIDUK, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Haiduk v. Commissioner
Docket No. 36632-87
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1990-506; 1990 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 559; 60 T.C.M. (CCH) 864; T.C.M. (RIA) 90506;
September 24, 1990, Filed
Daniel J. Cooper, for the petitioners.
Stephen Ianello, for the respondent.
COUVILLION, Special Trial Judge.
COUVILLION
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This case was assigned pursuant to section 7443A(b)(3) 1 and Rule 180 et seq.
At issue is a motion by petitioners for entry of decision as to which respondent has filed a notice of objection. At…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Drake v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Gingerich v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Treaty Pines Investments Partnership v. Commissioner Of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Treaty Pines Investments Partnership v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Estate of Ray v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.