Polonius v. State

The appellant was convicted of a violation of the Prohibition Act. The trial was by the court without a jury. A motion for a new trial was made and overruled. Judgment was entered on the finding of the court and from such judgment appellant appeals and assigns as error the overruling of his motion for a new trial. The only question presented by the motion for a new trial is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding.

The appellant says that the conviction was based solely on circumstantial evidence and it is his contention *665that where evidence is circumstantial and leaves standing…