Legal Opinion
Heinemann v. Grunfeld
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 6, 1996PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered on or about February 10, 1995, which denied defendant’s motion to transfer the venue of this action to Westchester County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The party moving for a change of venue pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) has the burden of demonstrating that the convenience of material witnesses would be better served by the change (Cardona v Aggressive Heating, 180 AD2d 572). The movant’s showing must include (1) the identity of the proposed witnesses, (2) the manner in which they would be inconvenienced by a trial in the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cardon v. Aggressive Heating Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Moghazeh v. Valdes-RodriGuezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lawyers' Fund v. Gateway State BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. v. Marcott Pharmacy North Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Lapidus v. 1050 Tenants Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Gersten v. LemkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Timan v. SayeghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.