Bradford v. Michigan

(concurring in result with Allen, P.J.). I also concur with the result reached in the lead opinion. I write separately because I believe *770the lead opinion too hastily dismisses the question of whether the intentional nuisance exception to governmental immunity has been abolished by Ross v Consumers Power Co (On Rehearing), 420 Mich 567; 363 NW2d 641 (1984).

When a plaintiff suing the state pleads facts which demonstrate that the activity alleged is in the "exercise or discharge of a governmental function,” MCL 691.1407; MSA 3.996(107), the claim is barred by governmental immunity unless the…