Legal Opinion

Lockard v. Whitenack

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 20, 1928PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

This litigation had its inception in a motion for judgment returnable on March 20, 1923, to the Corporation Court of the city of Roanoke. In it Seth *146Lockard undertook to notify L. O. Whitenack and P. G. Moore that he would ask judgment against them for damages caused by reckless operation of an automobile owned by Whitenack and run by his agent, Moore. This motion was served on Whitenack but not on Moore.

For the purpose of representing him, P. H. Dillard, Jr., a member of the law firm of Dillard, Moomaw & Dillard, went with Whitenack to that court on the morning of the return day. For some…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Shelton v. TiffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
  3. Harshey v. BlackmarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  4. Barnes v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  5. Great West Min. Co. v. Woodmas of Alston Min. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Raymond Thomas Council v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  2. Piedmont Trust Bank v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1969
  3. Wilson v. ButtSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
  4. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. MaceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
  5. Murden v. WilbertSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API