Legal Opinion
Ibrahim Mohammed v. Geoffrey Sinckler
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 22, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00019Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IBRAHIM MOHAMMED, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:25-cv-00019 (BRM)(JRA) v. OPINION GEOFFREY SINCKLER, Defendant. MARTINOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Ibrahim Mohammed’s (“Plaintiff”) objection to a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) by the Hon. José R. Almonte, U.S.M.J.,1 dated March 4, 2026, which holds this Court lacks personal jurisdiction over pro se defendant Geoffrey Sinkler (“Defendant”). (ECF No. 31.) Defendant opposed Plaintiff’s objection. (ECF No. 33.) Having reviewed and considered the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.