Legal Opinion

Lett v. Horner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1840PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the PiJce Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

Horner sued Lett in assumpsit for money had and received. Pleas, non assumpsit and payment. Verdict for the plaintiff. Motion for a new trial overruled; and judgment on the verdict.

Horner contracted with Lett, on the 30th of November, 1836, for the purchase of a tract of land. The price was 2,710 dollars. Horner paid 670 dollars at the time of the contract, and gave his note for the residue, payable twelve months after date. Lett gave the purchaser a bond, conditioned for a conveyance when the note should be paid. The condition states that if Horner failed to pay the note when due, the bond…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peisch v. DicksonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1815

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Furnace & Mining Co. v. HerkimerIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Evansville, Indianapolis, & Cleveland Straight Line Railroad v. MeedsIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Baker v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Ochs v. M. J. Carnahan Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API