Legal Opinion

United Private Detective & Security Ass'n v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1976No. 47531PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Ward

This appeal concerns the power of the General Assembly to provide for the exclusive exercise by the State of a power of a home rule unit. We must consider sections 6(a), 6(g), 6(h) and 6(i) of article VII of the Constitution of 1970 in determining whether the City of Chicago has been barred by the General Assembly’s action from regulating the operations or business of private detectives. (Ill. Const. 1970, art. VII, secs. 6(a), 6(g), 6(h) and 6(i).) Those sections provide:

“(a) *** Except as limited by this Section, a home ride unit may exercise any power and perform any function pertaining to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fuehrmeyer v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Wilkie v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Co-Ordinated Transport, Inc. v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  4. People ex rel. City of Springfield v. EdmandsIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. People Ex Rel. Gramlich v. City of PeoriaIllinois Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. City of Canton v. CrouchIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Easley v. Apollo Detective Agency, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Alarm Detection Systems, Inc. v. Village of HinsdaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. United Private Detective & Security Ass'n v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Andruss v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API