Legal Opinion

Holthusen v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 1943No. Civ. 3223PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARD, District Judge.

This matter arises on defendant’s application to dissolve an injunction restraining it from granting certain proposed options to specified executive and administrative employees.

The case was originally before me on plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction prohibiting defendant from enacting, attempting to enact, or permitting its shareholders to vote upon a proposed new article to the by-laws of the defendant authorizing its board of directors to grant the options in question, on the ground that such a by-law was illegal, and on defendant’s motion to dismiss the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holthusen v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kerbs v. California Eastern Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Blish v. Thompson Automatic Arms Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1948
  3. Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  4. Vulcanized Rubber & Plastics Co. v. ScheckterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Eliasberg v. Standard Oil Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API