Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Magoon

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1903Published

ORIGINAL.

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OF

GALBRAITH, J.

This^is one of the series of disbarment proceedings growing out of the recent litigation concerning the proceeds of the sale of the John K. Sumner reef property to the Oahu Railway and Land Company.

It is charged in the information filed by the Attorney General that J. Alfred Magoon, a member of the bar of this court, “has been guilty of professional improprieties, malpractice and 'gross misconduct,” setting out specific charges. It will be necessary here to consider only the specifications that find support in the evidence.

*254These are as follows: 1. “That on or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Evans v. EllisCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1846
  2. Brock v. BarnesNew York Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Reynolds v. McMillanIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  4. In re the Estate of DorlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Christley v. MagoonHawaii Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API