Legal Opinion

Nance v. Williams

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1968No. 6817SC323PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBritt, J.

The principal question presented is whether the pleadings and evidence were sufficient to permit a charge to the jury on the violation of G.S. 20-140, the reckless driving statute.

G.S. 1-180 requires the judge, in charging a petit jury in a civil or criminal action, to declare and explain the law arising on the evidence given in the case. It is error for the court to charge upon an abstract principle of law which is not presented by the allegations and evidence. Motor Freight v. DuBose, 260 N.C. 497, 113 S.E. 2d 129; Carswell v. Lackey, 253 N.C. 387, 117 S.E. 2d 51; Andrews v. Sprott, 249…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Dunlap v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Roberts v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Ingle v. Roy Stone Transfer CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Carswell v. LackeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ford ex rel. Ford v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Huggins v. KyeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Haynes v. BusbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Huggins v. HOSPITAL BD. OF MONOGALLIA COUNTYWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API