Legal Opinion

West Point Water Power & Land Improvement Co. v. State ex rel. Moodie

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1896No. 6064PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

In this, an action instituted in the district court of Canning county, the relator, the county attorney of said county, asked the issuance of a writ of mandamus ordering the respondent to make and keep a suitable fishway for the passage of fish over and around a mill-dam owned and maintained by it in the Elkhorn river. To an answer filed by the respondent, the relator filed a general demurrer, which was sustained and, the respondent electing not to plead further, a peremptory writ of mandamus *225was granted and issued against it, as prayed in the application or petition. The case was presented…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hower v. AultmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Oakley v. Valley CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. West Point Water Power & Land Improvement Co. v. State ex rel. MoodieNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Broatch v. MooresNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Rex Lumber Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. State ex rel. County of Douglas v. McShaneNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Bank of Miller v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  5. State ex rel. Bottolfson v. School Board of School District No. R 1Nebraska Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API