Legal Opinion

Campo v. Paar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 23, 1963PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteuer, J.

Plaintiff has recovered a verdict in an action for slander. The verdict as rendered by the jury was so contradictory in its terms that it is apparent that the jury had no clear appreciation of the issues involved. In outline, the facts are: Plaintiff had for a considerable period been a performer on defendant’s television shows. Defendant gave him notice that the employment was about to be terminated. Plaintiff told a reporter for the New York Post that he was being discharged because he was about to marry a young lady who was also a performer on the same show. The reporter informed his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Collier v. Postum Cereal Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. Valentine v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Karaduman v. Newsday, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Davis v. Costa-GavrasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  3. Geraci v. ProbstNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Rand v. New York Times Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API