Legal Opinion

Alabama Great So. R. Co. v. Martin

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1949PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberds, J.

Martin, as plaintiff, seeks in this action to recover of appellant, defendant below, the value of an automobile, the property of Martin, alleged by plaintiff to have been negligently struck and demolished by a passenger train of the Eailroad Company. The jury found for plaintiff in the sum of One Thousand Dollars, and the Eailroad Company appeals. '

It contends on this appeal (1) that no negligence is shown on its part; (2) that appellee is estopped to maintain this action; and (3) that the right is barred by the six-year statute of limitation.

We have concluded the first contention is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hinds v. MooreMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Yazoo M.V.R. Co. v. LumMississippi Supreme Court · 1941

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Creten v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  2. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. WhiteMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Orr v. Columbus & Greenville Ry. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1950
  4. New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. PhillipsMississippi Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API