State v. Harrell

DOYLE, Presiding Judge.

The State appeals from the grant of a motion to suppress filed by Bryan Lamar Harrell, who was indicted for illegally using a communication facility1 (four counts), possessing marijuana,2 and possessing cocaine.3 The State contends that the trial court erred by concluding that the wiretap was unlawful. Because the trial court’s legal conclusions are incorrect or unsupported by the record, we reverse.

“In this Court’s review of a trial court’s grant or denial of a motion to suppress, the trial court’s findings on disputed facts will be upheld unless clearly erroneous, and…