Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rupp v. United States (In Re Rocky Mountain Refractories)

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 30, 1997No. BAP No. UT-96-040, Bankruptcy No. 94-21665Published

1Dissent

BOHANON, Bankruptcy Judge,

dissenting.

My interpretation of the statutes in question requires that I dissent from the decision of my colleagues for it is my conclusion the Bankruptcy Code mandates that the governmental units are not entitled to priority in payment of their claims for interest on taxes.

THE STATUTES GOVERNING BANKRUPTCY PRIORITIES FOR INTEREST ON TAXES

The gist of the majority decision is that “ § 726 only comes into play postconversion” and “[although § 726(a)(5) bifurcates a claim into underlying claim and interest, that rule applies to claims incurred in a Chapter 7 and has no…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Bruning v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Nicholas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. In Re Mark Anthony Construction, Inc., Debtor. United States of America v. Ian Ledlin, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API