Farrell v. Boggs & Buhl, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 108, Oct. T., 1918, by defendant, from order of C. P. Allegheny Co., July T., 1916, No. 1669, refusing defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. in the case of Rose T. Farrell v. Boggs & Buhl, Inc. Action in trespass for personal injuries sustained while a passenger in defendant’s autobus as a result of collision.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 108, Oct. T., 1918, by defendant, from order of C. P. Allegheny Co., July T., 1916, No. 1669, refusing defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. in the case of Rose T. Farrell v. Boggs & Buhl, Inc. Action in trespass for personal injuries sustained while a passenger in defendant’s autobus as a result of collision. Before Shaper, P. J. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $3,700. The court refused a motion for judgment for defendant n. o. v. in the following opinion by Shaper, P. J.: The action is against the owners of a department store for injuries alleged to have been caused by…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The complaint of the appellant is that this case was submitted to a jury. No complaint is made of the charge if it was for their consideration, and there ;is no assignment alleging error in the admission or rejection of testimony. That the injuries sustained by the appellee resulted from the collision of appellant’s automobile bus, in which she was riding, with a truck, was a fact fairly to be found from the testimony, and that the question of the negligence of appellant’s chauffeur as the cause of the collision was for the jury clearly appears in the opinion of the learned court…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Wolf v. SweeneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921