Legal Opinion
Haskill v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided April 26, 1843PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Presentment Error to the Louisville City Court. Case 93. The ease stated,
1Opinion of the Court
Judge Bheck
delivered the opinion of tlie Court.
This is a presentment, against plaintiff in error, for selling by retail, in the City of Louisville, spirituous liquors, without license of the Council of the City.
Two questions are presented: 1st. As to the sufficiency of the presentment — 2d. Whether the virdict and judgment are sustained by the testimony.
The first question depends upon the construction of an act passed February, 1839, entitled “ An Act to amend the 14th Section of an Act entitled an Act to amend the Charter of the City of Louisville. ”
A construction is given to that Act, and…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Conyers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
- Ledford v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Hopper v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1857
- Commonwealth v. Read Phosphate Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
- Commonwealth v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.