Legal Opinion

Darden v. Williams

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1898PublishedCited by 7 opinions

PROM WILSON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Wilson County. W. C. Houston, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.

This case involved an issue of devi-savit vel non as to the will of William Lillard, the trial of which resulted in a verdict sustaining the will. ■ The contestants are in this Court by appeal, and have assigned many errors upon the action of the trial Judge in his rulings upon the testimony as. well as a portion of his general charge, and on his. *415failure to grant special requests. These errors, however, we cannot consider because of the anomalous condition of the bill of exceptions. Waiving a number of serious objections to it which might be taken, a vital defect is that it shows that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Seymour Woollen Factory Co. v. BrodheckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. FortTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Dennis v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Cobble, Admr. v. International Agri. Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925
  4. Allison v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Bales v. BalesTennessee Supreme Court · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API