Darden v. Williams
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM WILSON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Wilson County. W. C. Houston, J.
1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.
This case involved an issue of devi-savit vel non as to the will of William Lillard, the trial of which resulted in a verdict sustaining the will. ■ The contestants are in this Court by appeal, and have assigned many errors upon the action of the trial Judge in his rulings upon the testimony as. well as a portion of his general charge, and on his. *415failure to grant special requests. These errors, however, we cannot consider because of the anomalous condition of the bill of exceptions. Waiving a number of serious objections to it which might be taken, a vital defect is that it shows that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Seymour Woollen Factory Co. v. BrodheckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by7 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. FortTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Dennis v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- Cobble, Admr. v. International Agri. Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925
- Allison v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
- Bales v. BalesTennessee Supreme Court · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.