Legal Opinion

MATTER OF FINNERAN v. Hayduk

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 1, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Subdivision 1 of section 6-132 of the Election Law provides that a candidate must state his place of residence on the designating petition. Here, with respect to his place of residence, the appellant listed Scarsdale on sheets 1 through 11 and Greenburgh on sheets 12 through 15. In fact as the trial court found, the appellant resides within the Town of Green-burgh and not within the Town of Scarsdale, two separate nonoverlapping municipalities. There is no indication on the record before us that appellant…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Maloney v. Ulster County Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Blue v. WilkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Brigandi v. BaraschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Coster v. LewinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API