Legal Opinion

Leach v. Detroit Electric Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1900PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Erfor to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by Angeline Leach against the Detroit Electric Railway for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment for injuries received by her while alighting from a street car. The case is brought here by writ of error.

It is claimed the court abused its discretion in refusing to continue the case from Thursday until the following Tuesday to enable the defendant to procure one Sherman as a witness. It is said his attendance was arranged for upon October 15th, the case was continued at the request of plaintiff, and when the trial was commenced counsel supposed they could procure the attendance of the witness at any time, but when they sent for him he was out of the city.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sax v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Mott v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mulcahy v. Argo Steel Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Schmand v. JandorfMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Foster v. Village of BellaireMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Geddis v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Tenney v. Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API