Wilson v. Cobb
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Distraint, from city court of Leesburg — Judge Long. January 25, 1908.
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
The original motion contains only the general grounds; the amendment contains several special grounds. The grounds of the amendment are not verified or approved by the trial judge. The following endorsement, signed by the judge, is not equivalent to an approval: “Bead, considered, and allowed.” Williams v. State, 120 Ga. 488 (48 S. E. 149); Sindy v. State, 120 Ga. 202 (47 S. E. 554); Jackson v. State, 116 Ga. 834 (43 S. E. 255).
Judgment affirmed.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Sindy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
3Cited by3 opinions
- Henderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Wright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Mack v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912