Legal Opinion

Seemangall v. Canada Dry Bottling Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 6, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Graci, J.), dated June 17, 1992, which granted the motion of the defendant Canada Dry Bottling Co. of New York for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

*523We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiffs are foreclosed from bringing this action because the plaintiff Tillak Seemangall applied for and received…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. MidiriaNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Deutsch v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API